↓ Skip to main content

Optimal jury design for homogeneous juries with correlated votes

Overview of attention for article published in Theory and Decision, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Optimal jury design for homogeneous juries with correlated votes
Published in
Theory and Decision, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11238-009-9170-2
Authors

Serguei Kaniovski, Alexander Zaigraev

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 14%
Computer Science 2 14%
Engineering 2 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 14%
Philosophy 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,486,178
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Theory and Decision
#64
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,195
of 110,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory and Decision
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them