↓ Skip to main content

Common Influencing Factors Are No Evidence of Association: A Comment on Callander, Newman, and Holt (2015)

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Common Influencing Factors Are No Evidence of Association: A Comment on Callander, Newman, and Holt (2015)
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10508-015-0645-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Wendler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 33%
Psychology 1 17%
Arts and Humanities 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2020.
All research outputs
#20,964,263
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#3,469
of 3,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,386
of 296,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#43
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.