| Title |
All-polyethylene Tibial Components are Equal to Metal-backed Components: Systematic Review and Meta-regression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-012-2582-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Klaas Auke Nouta, Wiebe C. Verra, Bart G. Pijls, Jan W. Schoones, Rob G. H. H. Nelissen |
| Abstract |
Less than 1% of all primary TKAs are performed with an all-polyethylene tibial component, although recent studies indicate all-polyethylene tibial components are equal to or better than metal-backed ones. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 41% |
| Engineering | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 30 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,516,507
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,845
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,578
of 187,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#56
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.