Title |
Correlation of high 18F-FDG uptake to clinical, pathological and biological prognostic factors in breast cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, November 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00259-010-1640-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Groheux, Sylvie Giacchetti, Jean-Luc Moretti, Raphael Porcher, Marc Espié, Jacqueline Lehmann-Che, Anne de Roquancourt, Anne-Sophie Hamy, Caroline Cuvier, Laetitia Vercellino, Elif Hindié |
Abstract |
The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the main clinicopathological and biological prognostic factors of breast cancer on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake. Only women with tumours larger than 20 mm (T2-T4) were included in order to minimize bias of partial volume effect. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 19% |
Researcher | 15 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 19% |
Unknown | 26 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 54% |
Engineering | 5 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Unknown | 32 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,199,713
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#767
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,713
of 102,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.