| Title |
CA125 test result, test-to-diagnosis interval and stage in ovarian cancer: a cohort study using electronic health records
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2020.0859 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Garth Funston, Luke TA Mounce, Sarah Price, Brian Rous, Emma J Crosbie, Willie Hamilton, Fiona M Walter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 63% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 22% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Librarian | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,848,362
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#914
of 4,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,926
of 516,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#25
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.