↓ Skip to main content

Urban as a Determinant of Health

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
335 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
694 Mendeley
Title
Urban as a Determinant of Health
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11524-007-9169-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Vlahov, Nicholas Freudenberg, Fernando Proietti, Danielle Ompad, Andrew Quinn, Vijay Nandi, Sandro Galea

Abstract

Cities are the predominant mode of living, and the growth in cities is related to the expansion of areas that have concentrated disadvantage. The foreseeable trend is for rising inequities across a wide range of social and health dimensions. Although qualitatively different, this trend exists in both the developed and developing worlds. Improving the health of people in slums will require new analytic frameworks. The social-determinants approach emphasizes the role of factors that operate at multiple levels, including global, national, municipal, and neighborhood levels, in shaping health. This approach suggests that improving living conditions in such arenas as housing, employment, education, equality, quality of living environment, social support, and health services is central to improving the health of urban populations. While social determinant and multilevel perspectives are not uniquely urban, they are transformed when viewed through the characteristics of cities such as size, density, diversity, and complexity. Ameliorating the immediate living conditions in the cities in which people live offers the greatest promise for reducing morbidity, mortality, and disparities in health and for improving quality of life and well being.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 694 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 676 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 124 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 16%
Researcher 98 14%
Student > Bachelor 55 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 6%
Other 134 19%
Unknown 132 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 164 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 102 15%
Environmental Science 48 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 27 4%
Other 131 19%
Unknown 176 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,820,384
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#256
of 1,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,929
of 76,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.