↓ Skip to main content

項目反応理論(IRT)の考え方と実践

Overview of attention for article published in The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
項目反応理論(IRT)の考え方と実践
Published in
The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan, March 2019
DOI 10.5926/arepj.58.321
Authors

宇佐美 慧, 荘島 宏二郎, 光永 悠彦, 登藤 直弥

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2021.
All research outputs
#23,078,414
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan
#141
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#319,752
of 365,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan
#13
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.