↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Marine Bacterial Isolates on the Growth and Morphology of Axenic Plantlets of the Green Alga Ulva linza

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Marine Bacterial Isolates on the Growth and Morphology of Axenic Plantlets of the Green Alga Ulva linza
Published in
Microbial Ecology, August 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00248-006-9060-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrina Marshall, Ian Joint, Maureen E. Callow, James A. Callow

Abstract

The green marine macroalga, Ulva linza, adopts an "atypical" form when grown in the absence of bacteria. Twenty unique strains of periphytic bacteria, isolated from three species of Ulva, were identified by 16S rDNA sequencing. These isolates were assessed for their effect on the growth and morphological development of axenic plantlets of U. linza. Results showed that the effect of bacterial strains was strain- but not taxon-specific. Thirteen isolates returned the aberrant morphology to normal and of these, five also significantly increased growth rate. One isolate increased growth, but had no effect on morphology. Biofilms of some of these isolates stimulated the settlement of Ulva zoospores but there was no correlation between bacterial isolates that stimulated zoospore settlement and those that initiated changes in morphology and/or growth of the cultured alga.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 170 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 15%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 35 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 49%
Environmental Science 20 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Unspecified 5 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 41 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2014.
All research outputs
#2,401,077
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#142
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,738
of 65,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.