↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and histological characteristics of recurrent oligodendroglial tumors: comparison between primary and recurrent tumors in 18 cases

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Tumor Pathology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Clinical and histological characteristics of recurrent oligodendroglial tumors: comparison between primary and recurrent tumors in 18 cases
Published in
Brain Tumor Pathology, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10014-012-0119-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masayuki Kanamori, Toshihiro Kumabe, Ichiyo Shibahara, Ryuta Saito, Yoji Yamashita, Yukihiko Sonoda, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Mika Watanabe, Teiji Tominaga

Abstract

Changes in histological and genetic characteristics were investigated in 18 paired primary and recurrent oligodendroglial tumors, using sequencing analysis for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2 gene mutation, Ki-67 and p53 immunohistochemistry, and fluorescent in situ hybridization for loss of heterozygosity of chromosomes 1p and 19q (1p/19q co-deletion). Malignant transformation occurred in 5 of 8 cases with World Health Organization (WHO) grade II tumors, but in 0 of 10 cases with WHO grade III tumors progressing to glioblastoma. Thirteen of the 18 cases carried IDH1 gene mutation. Tumors with IDH1 mutation tended to survive for longer, even after recurrence, but newly developed microvascular proliferation, tumor necrosis, and elevated Ki-67 labeling index were common. Eleven of the 13 IDH1-mutation tumors had either 1p/19q co-deletion or nuclear expression of p53, but all 5 IDH1/2 wild-type tumors had neither. All cases had the same profile for 1p/19q status at recurrence, but nuclear expression of p53 changed from negative to positive in 2 of 6 cases with IDH1 mutation and 1p/19q co-deletion. WHO grade II oligodendroglial tumors show a high rate of malignant transformation, possibly involving p53 in tumors with IDH1 mutation and 1p/19q co-deletion. Tumors with IDH1 mutation had a more aggressive histological phenotype despite their better prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 20%
Mathematics 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2012.
All research outputs
#18,317,537
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Brain Tumor Pathology
#93
of 167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,767
of 172,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Tumor Pathology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 167 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them