You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence of poly(n‐isopropylacrylamide)–CNT–polyaniline three‐dimensional electrospun microfabric scaffolds on cell growth and viability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biospectroscopy, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/bip.22170 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashutosh Tiwari, Yashpal Sharma, Shinya Hattori, Dohiko Terada, Ashok K. Sharma, Anthony P. F. Turner, Hisatoshi Kobayashi |
| Abstract |
This study investigates the effect on: (1) the bulk surface and (2) the three-dimensional non-woven microfabric scaffolds of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-CNT-polyaniline on growth and viability of cells. The poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-CNT-polyaniline was prepared using coupling chemistry and electrospinning was then used for the fabrication of responsive, non-woven microfabric scaffolds. The electrospun microfabrics were assembled in regular three-dimensional scaffolds with OD: 400-500 μm; L: 6-20 cm. Mice fibroblast cells L929 were seeded on the both poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-CNT-polyaniline bulk surface as well as non-woven microfabric scaffolds. Excellent cell proliferation and viability was observed on poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-CNT-polyaniline non-woven microfabric matrices in compare to poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-CNT-polyaniline bulk and commercially available Matrigel™ even with a range of cell lines up to 168 h. Temperature dependent cells detachment behavior was observed on the poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-CNT-polyaniline scaffolds by varying incubation at below lower critical solution temperature of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). The results suggest that poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-CNT-polyaniline non-woven microfabrics could be used as a smart matrices for applications in tissue engineering. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 99: 334-341, 2013. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 24% |
| Researcher | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 6 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 9 | 24% |
| Engineering | 5 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2012.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Biospectroscopy
#1,697
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,312
of 205,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biospectroscopy
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.