You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
都市の水場における騒音や光がカエルの繁殖地利用に与える影響
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.18960/hozen.23.2_177 |
| Authors |
石黒 寛人, 岩井 紀子 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 67% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#91
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,244
of 448,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.