↓ Skip to main content

Mass transfer resistance in a liquid‐phase microextraction employing a single hollow fiber under unsteady‐state conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Separation Science (JSS) (formerly Journal of High Resolution Chromatography), September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mass transfer resistance in a liquid‐phase microextraction employing a single hollow fiber under unsteady‐state conditions
Published in
Journal of Separation Science (JSS) (formerly Journal of High Resolution Chromatography), September 2012
DOI 10.1002/jssc.201200497
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ksenija R. Kumrić, Goran T. Vladisavljević, Jelena S. Đorđević, Jan Åke Jönsson, Tatjana M. Trtić‐Petrović

Abstract

In this study, the mass transport resistance in liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) in a single hollow fiber was investigated. A mathematical model has been developed for the determination of the overall mass transfer coefficient based on the acceptor phase in an unsteady state. The overall mass transfer coefficient in LPME in a single hollow fiber has been estimated from time-dependent concentration of extracted analyte in the acceptor phase while maintaining a constant analyte concentration in the donor phase. It can be achieved either using a high volume of donor to acceptor phase ratio or tuning the extraction conditions to obtain a low-enrichment factor, so that the analyte concentration in the sample is not significantly influenced by the mass transfer. Two extraction systems have been used to test experimentally the developed model: the extraction of Lu(III) from a buffer solution and the extraction of three local anesthetics from a buffer or plasma solution. The mass transfer resistance, defined as a reciprocal values of the mass transfer coefficient, was found to be 1.2 × 10(3) cm(-1) min for Lu(III) under optimal conditions and from 1.96 to 3.3 × 10(3) cm(-1) min for the local anesthetics depending on the acceptor pH and the hydrophobicity of the drug.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Professor 1 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 60%
Chemical Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Separation Science (JSS) (formerly Journal of High Resolution Chromatography)
#1,708
of 3,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,643
of 188,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Separation Science (JSS) (formerly Journal of High Resolution Chromatography)
#26
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,583 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.