You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Lens and retina regeneration: new perspectives from model organisms
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biochemical Journal, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1042/bj20120813 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karla Barbosa-Sabanero, Andrea Hoffmann, Chelsey Judge, Nicole Lightcap, Panagiotis A. Tsonis, Katia Del Rio-Tsonis |
Abstract |
Comparative studies of lens and retina regeneration have been conducted within a wide variety of animals over the last 100 years. Although amphibians, fish, birds and mammals have all been noted to possess lens- or retina-regenerative properties at specific developmental stages, lens or retina regeneration in adult animals is limited to lower vertebrates. The present review covers the newest perspectives on lens and retina regeneration from these different model organisms with a focus on future trends in regeneration research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 79 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 25% |
Researcher | 12 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Other | 14 | 18% |
Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 36% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 25% |
Neuroscience | 9 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,667,907
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical Journal
#10,461
of 11,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,713
of 172,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical Journal
#21
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,404 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.