↓ Skip to main content

Lens and retina regeneration: new perspectives from model organisms

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemical Journal, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lens and retina regeneration: new perspectives from model organisms
Published in
Biochemical Journal, October 2012
DOI 10.1042/bj20120813
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karla Barbosa-Sabanero, Andrea Hoffmann, Chelsey Judge, Nicole Lightcap, Panagiotis A. Tsonis, Katia Del Rio-Tsonis

Abstract

Comparative studies of lens and retina regeneration have been conducted within a wide variety of animals over the last 100 years. Although amphibians, fish, birds and mammals have all been noted to possess lens- or retina-regenerative properties at specific developmental stages, lens or retina regeneration in adult animals is limited to lower vertebrates. The present review covers the newest perspectives on lens and retina regeneration from these different model organisms with a focus on future trends in regeneration research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 25%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 25%
Neuroscience 9 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,667,907
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical Journal
#10,461
of 11,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,713
of 172,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical Journal
#21
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,404 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.