| Title |
Abrupt CO2 experiments as tools for predicting and understanding CMIP5 representative concentration pathway projections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climate Dynamics, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00382-012-1410-4 |
| Authors |
Peter Good, Jonathan M. Gregory, Jason A. Lowe, Timothy Andrews |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
| Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 47 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 17% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,486,178
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,021
of 4,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,575
of 164,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#24
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.