Title |
Diagnosing Community-Acquired Pneumonia: diagnostic accuracy study of a cough-centred algorithm for use in primary and acute-care consultations
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2020.0750 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul Porter, Joanna Brisbane, Udantha Abeyratne, Natasha Bear, Javan Wood, Vesa Peltonen, Phillip Della, Claire Smith, Scott Claxton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
Ireland | 1 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 12% |
Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Professor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 36 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 36 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,078,397
of 24,820,264 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,013
of 4,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,986
of 518,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#43
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,820,264 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.