↓ Skip to main content

Real-time urinary electrolyte monitoring after furosemide administration in surgical ICU patients with normal renal function

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Real-time urinary electrolyte monitoring after furosemide administration in surgical ICU patients with normal renal function
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13613-016-0168-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Zazzeron, Davide Ottolina, Eleonora Scotti, Michele Ferrari, Paola Bruzzone, Silvio Sibilla, Cristina Marenghi, Luciano Gattinoni, Pietro Caironi

Abstract

Although the loop-diuretic furosemide is widely employed in critically ill patients with known long-term effects on plasma electrolytes, accurate data describing its acute effects on renal electrolyte handling and the generation of plasma electrolyte alterations are lacking. We hypothesized that the long-term effects of furosemide on plasma electrolytes and acid-base depend on its immediate effects on electrolyte excretion rate and patient clinical baseline characteristics. By monitoring urinary electrolytes quasi-continuously, we aimed to verify this hypothesis in a cohort of surgical ICU patients with normal renal function. We retrospectively enrolled 39 consecutive patients admitted to a postoperative ICU after major surgery, and receiving single low-dose intravenous administration of furosemide. Urinary output, pH, sodium [Na(+)], potassium [K(+)], chloride [Cl(-)] and ammonium [NH4 (+)] concentrations were measured every 10 min for three to 8 h. Urinary anion gap (AG), electrolyte excretion rate, fractional excretion (Fe) and time constant of urinary [Na(+)] variation (τNa(+)) were calculated. Ten minutes after furosemide administration (12 ± 5 mg), urinary [Na(+)] and [Cl(-)], and their excretion rates, increased to similar levels (P < 0.001). After the first hour, urinary [Cl(-)] decreased less rapidly than [Na(+)], leading to a reduction in urinary AG and pH and an increment in urinary [NH4 (+)] (P < 0.001). Median urinary [Cl(-)] over the first 3-h period was higher than baseline urinary and plasmatic [Cl(-)] (P < 0.001). During the first 2 h, difference between FeCl(-) and FeNa(+) increased (P < 0.05). Baseline higher values of central venous pressure and FeNa(+) were associated with greater increases in FeNa(+) after furosemide (P = 0.03 and P = 0.007), whereas higher values of mean arterial and central venous pressures were associated with a longer τNa(+) (P < 0.05). In patients receiving multiple administrations (n = 11), arterial pH, base excess and strong ion difference increased, due to a decrease in plasmatic [Cl(-)]. Low-dose furosemide administration immediately modifies urinary electrolyte excretion rates, likely in relation to the ongoing proximal tubular activity, unveiled by its inhibitory action on Henle's loop. Such effects, when cumulative, found the bases for the long-term alterations observed. Real-time urinary electrolyte monitoring may help in tailoring patient diuretic and hemodynamic therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Other 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 55%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,404,683
of 23,956,119 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#429
of 1,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,814
of 369,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#10
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,956,119 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.