↓ Skip to main content

North–South Asymmetries in Earth’s Magnetic Field

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
North–South Asymmetries in Earth’s Magnetic Field
Published in
Space Science Reviews, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11214-016-0273-0
Authors

K. M. Laundal, I. Cnossen, S. E. Milan, S. E. Haaland, J. Coxon, N. M. Pedatella, M. Förster, J. P. Reistad

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Other 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 15 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 8%
Unspecified 1 3%
Energy 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 16 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,380,359
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#876
of 1,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,408
of 354,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.