↓ Skip to main content

Testing the correlations between anomalies of statistical indexes of the geoelectric system and earthquakes

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Testing the correlations between anomalies of statistical indexes of the geoelectric system and earthquakes
Published in
Natural Hazards, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2460-4
Authors

Hong-Jia Chen, Chien-Chih Chen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 38%
Computer Science 2 25%
Psychology 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,380,359
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,296
of 1,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,757
of 363,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#35
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.