↓ Skip to main content

Regenerative treatment in osteochondral lesions of the talus: autologous chondrocyte implantation versus one-step bone marrow derived cells transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in International Orthopaedics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Regenerative treatment in osteochondral lesions of the talus: autologous chondrocyte implantation versus one-step bone marrow derived cells transplantation
Published in
International Orthopaedics, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00264-015-2685-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Buda, Francesca Vannini, Francesco Castagnini, Marco Cavallo, Alberto Ruffilli, Laura Ramponi, Gherardo Pagliazzi, Sandro Giannini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Other 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Engineering 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 29 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,380,359
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#899
of 1,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,025
of 353,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#22
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,435 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.