↓ Skip to main content

Voting with one’s chainsaw: What happens when people are given the opportunity to freely remove urban trees?

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape & Urban Planning, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Voting with one’s chainsaw: What happens when people are given the opportunity to freely remove urban trees?
Published in
Landscape & Urban Planning, May 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104041
Authors

Jakub Kronenberg, Edyta Łaszkiewicz, Joanna Sziło

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Lecturer 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 2 3%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 24 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 19%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 27 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,783,005
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#274
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,497
of 453,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.