↓ Skip to main content

Consequences of Fish Kills for Long-Term Trophic Structure in Shallow Lakes: Implications for Theory and Restoration

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Consequences of Fish Kills for Long-Term Trophic Structure in Shallow Lakes: Implications for Theory and Restoration
Published in
Ecosystems, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10021-016-0005-z
Authors

Carl D. Sayer, Thomas A. Davidson, Ruth Rawcliffe, Peter G. Langdon, Peter R. Leavitt, Georgina Cockerton, Neil L. Rose, Toby Croft

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 19 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,048,507
of 25,249,294 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#148
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,848
of 373,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,249,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.