| Title |
Workplace performance of a loose-fitting powered air purifying respirator during nanoparticle synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11051-015-2990-9 |
| Authors |
Antti J. Koivisto, Mikko Aromaa, Ismo K. Koponen, Wouter Fransman, Keld A. Jensen, Jyrki M. Mäkelä, Kaarle J. Hämeri |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 17% |
| Engineering | 5 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#288
of 1,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,137
of 283,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,040 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.