↓ Skip to main content

Holographic particle image velocimetry system for measurements of hairpin vortices in air channel flow

Overview of attention for article published in Experiments in Fluids, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Holographic particle image velocimetry system for measurements of hairpin vortices in air channel flow
Published in
Experiments in Fluids, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00348-006-0108-y
Authors

A. Svizher, J. Cohen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 26 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 28%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 17%
Researcher 4 14%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 20 69%
Physics and Astronomy 5 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 7%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,486,178
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#155
of 1,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,802
of 155,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.