↓ Skip to main content

Coding of abstract quantity by ‘number neurons’ of the primate brain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Coding of abstract quantity by ‘number neurons’ of the primate brain
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00359-012-0763-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Nieder

Abstract

Humans share with nonhuman animals a quantification system for representing the number of items as nonverbal mental magnitudes. Over the past decade, the anatomical substrates and neuronal mechanisms of this quantification system have been unraveled down to the level of single neurons. Work with behaviorally trained nonhuman primates identified a parieto-frontal cortical network with individual neurons selectively tuned to the number of items. Such 'number neurons' can track items across space, time, and modality to encode numerosity in a most abstract, supramodal way. The physiological properties of these neurons can explain fundamental psychophysical phenomena during numerosity judgments. Functionally overlapping groups of parietal neurons represent not only numerable-discrete quantity (numerosity), but also innumerable-continuous quantity (extent) and relations between quantities (proportions), supporting the idea of a generalized magnitude system in the brain. These studies establish putative homologies between the monkey and human brain and demonstrate the suitability of nonhuman primates as model system to explore the neurobiological roots of the brain's nonverbal quantification system, which may constitute the evolutionary foundation of all further, more elaborate numerical skills in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 3%
United States 3 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 119 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 29%
Researcher 28 22%
Student > Master 12 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 16%
Neuroscience 13 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 31 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,164,435
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#238
of 1,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,033
of 193,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.