You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surgical decision making in premenopausal BRCA carriers considering risk-reducing early salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Genetics, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107501 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Faiza Gaba, Shivam Goyal, Dalya Marks, Dhivya Chandrasekaran, Olivia Evans, Sadiyah Robbani, Charlotte Tyson, Rosa Legood, Ertan Saridogan, W Glenn McCluggage, Helen Hanson, Naveena Singh, D Gareth Evans, Usha Menon, Ranjit Manchanda, Raji Ganesan, Gareth Bryson, Gareth Rowlands, Rupali Arora, Munaza Ahmed, Aarti Sharma, Gautam Mehra, Adam Rosenthal, Michelle Mackintosh, Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami, Omer Devaja, Sudha Sundar, Janos Balega, Tim Duncan, Claire Newton, Sonali Kaushik, Angela Brady, Supratik Chattopadhyay, Natalia Povolotskaya, Iain Cameron, Rema Iyer, Lucy Side, Katie Snape, Anil Tailor, Kavitha Thumuluru Madhuri, Katherine Edey, Sian Taylor, Manon van Seters, Suma Kodiathodi, Partha Sengupta, Scott Fegan, Karin Williamson, Andrew Phillips, Mark Willett, Tony Chalhoub, Sanjay Rao, Nicholas Matthews, Beena Abdul, Claire Park, Jane Borley, Ibraheem Hamoodi, Richard Hutson, Kerryn Lutchman-Singh, Richard Peevor, Mahalakshmi Gurumurthy, Kalpana Ragupathy, Emma Crosbie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 26% |
| United States | 5 | 22% |
| Ireland | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 87% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 16% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#999,956
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#55
of 3,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,627
of 548,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 548,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.