↓ Skip to main content

Direct determination of the chromosomal location of bunching onion and bulb onion markers using bunching onion–shallot monosomic additions and allotriploid-bunching onion single alien deletions

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Direct determination of the chromosomal location of bunching onion and bulb onion markers using bunching onion–shallot monosomic additions and allotriploid-bunching onion single alien deletions
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00122-010-1464-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hikaru Tsukazaki, Ken-ichiro Yamashita, Shigenori Yaguchi, Koichiro Yamashita, Takuya Hagihara, Masayoshi Shigyo, Akio Kojima, Tadayuki Wako

Abstract

To determine the chromosomal location of bunching onion (Allium fistulosum L.) simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and bulb onion (A. cepa L.) expressed sequence tags (ESTs), we used a complete set of bunching onion-shallot monosomic addition lines and allotriploid bunching onion single alien deletion lines as testers. Of a total of 2,159 markers (1,198 bunching onion SSRs, 324 bulb onion EST-SSRs and 637 bulb onion EST-derived non-SSRs), chromosomal locations were identified for 406 markers in A. fistulosum and/or A. cepa. Most of the bunching onion SSRs with identified chromosomal locations showed polymorphism in bunching onion (89.5%) as well as bulb onion lines (66.1%). Using these markers, we constructed a bunching onion linkage map (1,261 cM), which consisted of 16 linkage groups with 228 markers, 106 of which were newly located. All linkage groups of this map were assigned to the eight basal Allium chromosomes. In this study, we assigned 513 markers to the eight chromosomes of A. fistulosum and A. cepa. Together with 254 markers previously located on a separate bunching onion map, we have identified chromosomal locations for 766 markers in total. These chromosome-specific markers will be useful for the intensive mapping of desirable genes or QTLs for agricultural traits, and to obtain DNA markers linked to these.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 11%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 26%
Other 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 63%
Computer Science 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2012.
All research outputs
#21,141,111
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#3,320
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,984
of 101,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.