| Title |
Exercise for intermittent claudication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000990.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Risha Lane, Amy Harwood, Lorna Watson, Gillian C Leng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 21% |
| Australia | 5 | 9% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Belgium | 2 | 4% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 14% |
| Scientists | 5 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 506 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 506 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 70 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 11% |
| Researcher | 36 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 5% |
| Other | 95 | 19% |
| Unknown | 190 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 67 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 34 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 8% |
| Unknown | 218 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#473,849
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#803
of 13,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,695
of 452,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.