| Title |
Inhaled anti‐pseudomonal antibiotics for long‐term therapy in cystic fibrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001021.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sherie Smith, Nicola J Rowbotham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 2 | 20% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Researcher | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 55 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 59 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,630,696
of 25,904,557 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,154
of 13,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,810
of 434,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,904,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.