↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
Title
Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001478.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linjie Zhang, Sílvio OM Prietsch, Inge Axelsson, Scott A Halperin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 243 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Other 19 8%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 72 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 79 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,473,017
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,014
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,272
of 261,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.