| Title |
Nutritional supplementation for hip fracture aftercare in older people
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001880.pub6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison Avenell, Toby O Smith, James P Curtain, Jenson CS Mak, Phyo K Myint |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 14% |
| Canada | 4 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| Chile | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 60% |
| Scientists | 9 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 645 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 642 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 84 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 81 | 13% |
| Researcher | 54 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 6% |
| Other | 125 | 19% |
| Unknown | 216 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 186 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 84 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 2% |
| Psychology | 15 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 81 | 13% |
| Unknown | 249 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,066,391
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,142
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,261
of 416,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.