Title |
Pulse oximetry for perioperative monitoring
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002013.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tom Pedersen, Amanda Nicholson, Karen Hovhannisyan, Ann Merete Møller, Andrew F Smith, Sharon R Lewis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 15% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Spain | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 269 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 38 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 12% |
Other | 21 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 7% |
Other | 55 | 20% |
Unknown | 86 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 8% |
Psychology | 10 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
Engineering | 7 | 3% |
Other | 34 | 12% |
Unknown | 93 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,635,852
of 25,901,238 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,161
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,721
of 250,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,901,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.