| Title |
Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002042.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey L Carson, Simon J Stanworth, Jane A Dennis, Marialena Trivella, Nareg Roubinian, Dean A Fergusson, Darrell Triulzi, Carolyn Dorée, Paul C Hébert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| Germany | 3 | 9% |
| Mexico | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 293 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Researcher | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 16% |
| Unknown | 131 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 96 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 144 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,003,610
of 26,004,690 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,896
of 13,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,824
of 524,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,004,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.