| Title |
Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002128.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen Rees, Mariana Dyakova, Nicola Wilson, Kirsten Ward, Margaret Thorogood, Eric Brunner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 30% |
| Norway | 2 | 20% |
| South Africa | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 577 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 563 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 83 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 83 | 14% |
| Researcher | 74 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 10% |
| Other | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 118 | 20% |
| Unknown | 134 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 190 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 74 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 5% |
| Psychology | 24 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 4% |
| Other | 82 | 14% |
| Unknown | 155 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,838,828
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,445
of 13,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,865
of 322,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.