Title |
Early use of inhaled corticosteroids in the emergency department treatment of acute asthma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002308.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marcia L Edmonds, Stephen J Milan, Carlos A Camargo, Charles V Pollack, Brian H Rowe |
Abstract |
Systemic corticosteroid therapy is central to the management of acute asthma. The use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) may also be beneficial in this setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ecuador | 1 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 344 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 44 | 12% |
Student > Master | 41 | 12% |
Researcher | 37 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 8% |
Other | 25 | 7% |
Other | 68 | 19% |
Unknown | 111 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 144 | 41% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 5% |
Psychology | 10 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 1% |
Other | 26 | 7% |
Unknown | 120 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2016.
All research outputs
#2,266,427
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,664
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,460
of 286,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.