| Title |
Psychological therapies for chronic post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003388.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan I Bisson, Neil P Roberts, Martin Andrew, Rosalind Cooper, Catrin Lewis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| Belgium | 2 | 6% |
| Serbia | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 59% |
| Scientists | 8 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1141 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 214 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 171 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 121 | 10% |
| Researcher | 106 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 79 | 7% |
| Other | 194 | 17% |
| Unknown | 276 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 414 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 183 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 58 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 43 | 4% |
| Other | 102 | 9% |
| Unknown | 308 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2024.
All research outputs
#332,935
of 26,014,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#544
of 13,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,974
of 323,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,014,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.