| Title |
Inhaled magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003898.pub6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Knightly, Stephen J Milan, Rodney Hughes, Jennifer A Knopp‐Sihota, Brian H Rowe, Rebecca Normansell, Colin Powell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 299 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 11% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 6% |
| Researcher | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 16% |
| Unknown | 118 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 13% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Unknown | 127 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,758,163
of 25,898,387 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,641
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,104
of 450,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,898,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.