↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture for chronic constipation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture for chronic constipation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004117.pub4
Authors

Huijuan Cao, Yuyi Wang, Jingxu Su, Hong Zhao, Mei Han, Jian Ping Liu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 39%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Librarian 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 7 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#22,835,295
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,179
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#352,186
of 413,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.