| Title |
Treatment of periodontitis for glycaemic control in people with diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004714.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Terry C Simpson, Janet E Clarkson, Helen V Worthington, Laura MacDonald, Jo C Weldon, Ian Needleman, Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor, Sarah H Wild, Ambrina Qureshi, Andrew Walker, Veena A Patel, Dwayne Boyers, Joshua Twigg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
| Japan | 4 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 16% |
| Scientists | 4 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 266 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 11% |
| Unknown | 169 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 176 | 66% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 226. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#175,363
of 25,983,475 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#293
of 13,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,357
of 451,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,983,475 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.