Title |
(Ultra‐)long‐acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005613.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas Semlitsch, Jennifer Engler, Andrea Siebenhofer, Klaus Jeitler, Andrea Berghold, Karl Horvath |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Brazil | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 259 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 34 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
Researcher | 19 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 4% |
Other | 47 | 18% |
Unknown | 103 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 4% |
Psychology | 9 | 3% |
Other | 25 | 10% |
Unknown | 110 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,473,134
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,184
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,443
of 439,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.