Title |
Whole grain foods for the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006061.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marion Priebe, Jaap van Binsbergen, Rien de Vos, Roel J Vonk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 4 | 16% |
Spain | 3 | 12% |
United States | 3 | 12% |
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 68% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 24% |
Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 3383 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 52 | 2% |
Researcher | 45 | 1% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 1% |
Student > Bachelor | 35 | 1% |
Other | 17 | <1% |
Other | 62 | 2% |
Unknown | 3147 | 93% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 1% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | <1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | <1% |
Social Sciences | 12 | <1% |
Other | 36 | 1% |
Unknown | 3156 | 93% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,135,875
of 26,071,599 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,194
of 13,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,278
of 171,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,071,599 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.