↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2024
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006124.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georgios Kourounis, Samuel J Tingle, Thomas J Hoather, Emily R Thompson, Alistair Rogers, Tobias Page, Aliu Sanni, David A Rix, Naeem A Soomro, Colin Wilson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,755,295
of 26,058,621 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,722
of 13,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,626
of 234,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,058,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.