| Title |
Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in cancer patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006911.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joke Bradt, Cheryl Dileo, Lucanne Magill, Aaron Teague |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 182 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 32 | 18% |
| Spain | 17 | 9% |
| United States | 7 | 4% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 100 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 160 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 8% |
| Scientists | 4 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,070 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1062 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 164 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 145 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 95 | 9% |
| Researcher | 88 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 58 | 5% |
| Other | 209 | 20% |
| Unknown | 311 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 200 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 192 | 18% |
| Psychology | 152 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 37 | 3% |
| Other | 118 | 11% |
| Unknown | 331 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 426. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#69,120
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#126
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,469
of 358,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.