| Title |
Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007130.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sinead Tj McDonagh, Hasnain Dalal, Sarah Moore, Christopher E Clark, Sarah G Dean, Kate Jolly, Aynsley Cowie, Jannat Afzal, Rod S Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 15% |
| Germany | 3 | 15% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Scientists | 8 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 60 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 14% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 63 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,469,685
of 25,964,892 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,888
of 13,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,559
of 367,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,964,892 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.