| Title |
Interventions for improving palliative care for older people living in nursing care homes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007132.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sue Hall, Anna Kolliakou, Hristina Petkova, Katherine Froggatt, Irene J Higginson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 18% |
| Australia | 4 | 12% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Japan | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 18% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 380 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 14% |
| Researcher | 46 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 85 | 22% |
| Unknown | 98 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 65 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 10% |
| Psychology | 21 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 11% |
| Unknown | 107 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,557,485
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,181
of 13,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,968
of 120,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.