| Title |
High‐dose versus low‐dose oxytocin for augmentation of delayed labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007201.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Kenyon, Hironobu Tokumasu, Therese Dowswell, Debbie Pledge, Rintaro Mori |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 242 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 14% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 9% |
| Researcher | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 18% |
| Unknown | 69 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 80 | 33% |