| Title |
Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007892.pub7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David M Haas, Sarah Morgan, Karenrose Contreras, Savannah Kimball |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Colombia | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 61% |
| Scientists | 10 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 243 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 11% |
| Researcher | 23 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 134 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 144 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,330,899
of 25,880,948 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,688
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,831
of 409,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.