You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Amiodarone versus other pharmacological interventions for prevention of sudden cardiac death
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008093.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Juan Carlos Claro, Roberto Candia, Gabriel Rada, Fernando Baraona, Francisco Larrondo, Luz M Letelier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 8 | 42% |
Japan | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Chile | 1 | 5% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 26% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 191 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 30 | 16% |
Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
Researcher | 16 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 6% |
Other | 35 | 18% |
Unknown | 56 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
Psychology | 7 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Other | 19 | 10% |
Unknown | 63 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,288,173
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,704
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,755
of 397,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#124
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.