| Title |
Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008165.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judith A Cole, Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley, Mubarak Alqahtani, Heather E Barry, Cathal Cadogan, Audrey Rankin, Susan M Patterson, Ngaire Kerse, Chris R Cardwell, Cristin Ryan, Carmel Hughes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Austria | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 71% |
| Scientists | 6 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 188 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 23% |
| Unknown | 66 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 36% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 70 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,593,692
of 26,051,341 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,255
of 13,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,338
of 364,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,051,341 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.