| Title |
Cold‐water immersion (cryotherapy) for preventing and treating muscle soreness after exercise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008262.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chris Bleakley, Suzanne McDonough, Evie Gardner, G. David Baxter, J. Ty Hopkins, Gareth W Davison |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 26 | 24% |
| United States | 21 | 19% |
| Canada | 8 | 7% |
| Australia | 6 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Italy | 3 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 81 | 74% |
| Scientists | 17 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 427 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 83 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 66 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 7% |
| Researcher | 27 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 64 | 15% |
| Unknown | 140 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 22% |
| Sports and Recreations | 56 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 13% |
| Psychology | 18 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 47 | 11% |
| Unknown | 151 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 743. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#27,435
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80
of 259,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.