| Title |
Curcumin for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008424.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sushil K Garg, Vineet Ahuja, Mari Jeeva Sankar, Atul Kumar, Alan C Moss |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 26% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 413 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 135 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 15% |
| Researcher | 39 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 65 | 15% |
| Unknown | 70 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 142 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 69 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 11% |
| Unknown | 88 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2024.
All research outputs
#749,071
of 25,972,223 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,332
of 13,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,157
of 194,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,972,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.